Adrocknaphobia wrote on 2010-02-25:
> We (Adobe) conducted a survey last September that reached out to
> ColdFusion customers (separately from the online community). Here is the
> breakdown of framework usage. However, I will say that popularity
> doesn't really mean much, nor does it give reliable credit to the
> usefulness of a framework. Remember, for years, Fusebox was the only
> game in town, so there were _a lot_ of application written with it.
> Mach-ii: 12%
> Model-Glue: 19%
> Transfer: 14%
> Fusebox: 51%
> ColdSpring: 33%
> ColdBox: 20%
> Other: 20%
So how do you add up those percentages? Something is fishy there - was it
possible to select multiple options? It is a bit odd that Transfer and
Coldspring are in there, since they are not application frameworks.
Cheers,
Hugo
--
Hugo Ahlenius
-------------------------------------------------------------
Hugo Ahlenius E-Mail: hugo.ahlenius(at)nordpil.com
Phone: +46 75 7575284
Nordpil Fax: +46 8 6747020
http://nordpil.com Mobile: +46 733 467111
Skype: callto:hugo.ahlenius
vCard: http://nordpil.com/hugoahlenius.vcf
-------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:331125
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
