We normally see about 12 requests / machine / sec during peak load.  I agree 
that 64 bit should help by making it possible to use more RAM. We're currently 
running 32bit with 1.25 GB allocated to the JVM and often come within 10 - 15% 
of the available JVM RAM on single machines for short periods of time.  

Do you find that you are under-utilizing the CPU in the 8 core machines? 

Any suggestions for particular JVM upgrades that have helped you in the past or 
do you think upgrades / config tweaks are very application specific?

>As Dave said - 64bit will give you the biggest boost.  Mainly because 
> you can setup massive memory allocations for the JVM.  Our servers 
> each have 8Gb of memory with 4Gb setup for the JVM.
> 
> More cores the better is the mantra, but we run 4 and 8 core servers 
> and really don't see much different between the two in performance. 
> 
> I'd stick with SCSI drives if you need a lot of read/write access.
> 
> And yes certain JVM upgrades can boost the speed mainly because of the 
> bugs in earlier versions cause object creation to be very slow.  
> 
> How much load is your application seeing?  Hard configuration and 
> scale will be affected by your applications load.
> 
> 
> 
> Wil Genovese
> 
> One man with courage makes a majority.
> -Andrew Jackson
> 
> A fine is a tax for doing wrong. A tax is a fine for doing well. 
> 
> On Mar 12, 2010, at 11:25 AM, John Foster wrote:
> 
> > 
> > We are looking to speed up our application layer as much as possible. 
> We've pumped the DB up substantially and had great results. I realize 
> there are network, load balancer, memcache, etc and other ways than 
> the hardware to have impact, but we want to buy whatever will give us 
> some gain.
> > 
> > Unfortunately, we didn't notice with a dual quad core server a ton 
> of impact in the past and didn't seem to be able to get the full 
> utilization, so we just stayed with multiple servers instead of fewer, 
> beefier servers.
> > 
> > Will 64 bit and many cores be the best for CF 9? Or less cores at 
> higher clock?
> > 
> > Does more memory help much?
> > 
> > How about SSD hard drives for local source code?  I wouldn't expect 
> that, but somebody seemed to suggest that somewhere.
> > 
> > Does CF Enterprise make a big difference?
> > 
> > Should we change the JVM to a faster one? What would that be?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks! 
> > 
> > 


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:331741
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to