If jQuery is too difficult for a dev I posit that that dev should not be a dev. ;)
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Raymond Camden <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm a huge fan of jQuery as well - but remember that for a _lot_ of > folks, jQuery is going to be far too difficult. CF's Ajax stuff > provide a _super_ easy way to do Ajaxy stuff. :) > > On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Gerald Guido <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >>>The only way to reduc ethat is you use your own solution instead of the > > built in ones, > > > > +1. > > > > I am not a fan of CF's Ajax stuff for just that reason. CF form yes. > CFForm > > is only 15k to 30k depending on your version of CF. But once you start > > getting into the AJAX-y stuff CF seems to use monolithic JS files that > > handle boatloads of features where as with jQuery UI you can roll your > own > > and only use the libraries that you need. > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:336687 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
