Unfortunately I'm on CF8. And I wonder if the ternary operator would be able
to handle a dynamic value as the output as with my example. IIF works
perfect for exactly the type of example you gave; a simple boolean evaluated
to output a simple string. The problem lies in CF apparently evaluating the
two outputs before determining if the StruckKey exists.


On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Andy Matthews <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> CF9 has the ternary operator which is awesome. Works like JavaScript:
>
> <cfset output = (boolean ? "It was True" : "It was False")>
>
>
>
> andy
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Grant [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 4:17 PM
> To: cf-talk
> Subject: Re: Finding if a key exists in a struct based on a variable name
>
>
> HA! So I'm not the only one!
> So I thought DE meant "Delay Evaluation" as in "Don't evaluate what's in
> these little brackets this until you've satisfied the IIF condition."
> I guess not?
>
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Raymond Camden <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Bah - I hacked away at it for 10 minutes before remembering why I
> > hated IIF/DE in the first place. ;)
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Michael Grant <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Try running this:
> > >
> > > <cfset x = {}>
> > > <cfset y = "all">
> > > <cfoutput>
> > > #iif(StructKeyExists(x,"#y#head"),DE('yes'),DE('no'))#
> > > </cfoutput>
> > > <p>
> > > <!--- <cfset x["allhead"] = "booger"> ---> <cfoutput>
> > > #iif(StructKeyExists(x,"#y#head"),DE(x["#y#head"]),DE('no'))#
> > > </cfoutput>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:336884
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to