ok sorry I must have missed that in the original post.

On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:58 AM, Mike Chabot <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> If someone is in office with a range of 2004 - 2006, the year 2005
> does not appear in the SQL results, yet 2005 needs to be grouped on.
> You can't group on a value that doesn't exist. There is no year column
> in the output to group on, only a start date and an end date.
>
> -Mike Chabot
>
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Russ Michaels <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Mike,
> >
> > why do you would you need to know the exact years to use grouped output?
> > This is not how it works.
> > Grouped output simply groups the output by the defined column
> > So if you group ny year, it will output all records with the same year
> > together allowing you to then separate the output, add headings etc.
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Mike Chabot <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> The grouped output doesn't work because the exact years are not known
> >> in the query output. Only the date range is known.
> >>
> >> -Mike Chabot
> >>
> >> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 5:20 AM, Russ Michaels <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > did the grouped cfoutpout not work for you then ?
> >> >
> >> > On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 4:55 AM, GLM <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Mike thanks for the lead. It had crossed my mind to build a numbers
> >> table
> >> >> but I didn't think it would work. (I've never used them myself.)
> >> >>
> >> >> I thought that it was somewhat excessive as there would have to be at
> >> least
> >> >> 365x220 rows (over 80,000). In the examples I gave I think one row
> per
> >> year
> >> >> (220) would be more than good enough but there are numerous
> exceptions
> >> >> (people dying in office, getting nominated to higher office, etc...)
> >> >>
> >> >> I'll give it a shot.
> >> >>
> >> >> Thx
> >> >>
> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> From: Mike Chabot [mailto:[email protected]]
> >> >> Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2010 10:50 PM
> >> >> To: cf-talk
> >> >> Subject: Re: cfoutput or cfloop? which is the more practical solution
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> You can do this in SQL, although the methods I can think of involve
> >> >> advanced techniques so I hesitate to recommend them based on your
> >> >> stated SQL experience. One technique involves joining to a "numbers
> >> >> table" which will transform the start and end dates into one row per
> >> >> year.
> >> >>
> >> >> You can use the cfloop technique in your first post. It should get
> the
> >> >> job done. It isn't the fastest method, but it could be fast enough.
> >> >> One alternative to consider would be to have one big database query,
> >> >> then loop over the one query once and build up an array or a
> structure
> >> >> containing the data you want to output, then cfoutput the array or
> >> >> structure.
> >> >>
> >> >> -Mike Chabot
> >> >>
> >> >> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:28 PM, GLM <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Thanks Mike,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I'm not a SQL expert but I don't see how. I can do something with
> >> >> particular
> >> >> > fields such as the year the person was elected (governorDateStart)
> or
> >> >> when
> >> >> > the person left office governorDateEnd
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >        SELECT
> >> >> >                governorParty,
> >> >> >                COUNT(governorState),
> >> >> >                governorDateStart
> >> >> >        WHERE gender=female
> >> >> >
> >> >> >        FROM
> >> >> >                governors
> >> >> >
> >> >> >        GROUP BY governorParty, governorDateStart
> >> >> >
> >> >> > And get something along the line of:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > 2001 - Republican - 2
> >> >> > 2002 - Republican - 1
> >> >> > 2003 - Democratic - 3
> >> >> > 2003 - Republican - 1
> >> >> > 2004 - Democratic - 1
> >> >> > 2004 - Republican - 1
> >> >> > 2005 - Democratic - 1
> >> >> > 2006 - Republican - 1
> >> >> > 2009 - Democratic - 1
> >> >> > 2009 - Republican - 1
> >> >> >
> >> >> > But what's desired is: how many are in office at a particular time.
> >> >> > For instance:
> >> >> >  list the governors in 1889;
> >> >> >  list the number of female governors in 2005
> >> >> >
> >> >> > thx
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> >> > From: Mike Chabot [mailto:[email protected]]
> >> >> > Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 7:35 PM
> >> >> > To: cf-talk
> >> >> > Subject: Re: cfoutput or cfloop? which is the more practical
> solution
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Are you able to craft a query that will return the results you need
> >> >> > without ColdFusion having to do any extra parsing of it? That is
> the
> >> >> > first thing I would try. In your brief example it seems like that
> >> >> > would be solved using a GROUP BY statement in the query.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > -Mike Chabot
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 7:23 PM, GLM <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I have a database with presidents, governors, etc. and need to be
> >> able
> >> >> to
> >> >> >> pull out information such as:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Get the number of all female governors over the years and spit out
> >> >> > something
> >> >> >> on the order of:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> 1789 : 0
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> 1790 : 0
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> .
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> 2005 : 10
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> .
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> 2010 : 6
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> The database has dateStarted, dateEnded
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I can loop through this  [SIMPLIFIED CODE]
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> <cfloop>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>                <cfquery>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>                                SELECT
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>                                FROM
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>                                WHERE year == #desiredYear#
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>                </cfquery>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> </cfloop>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> This seems like a foolish way to do this. Is there a better way to
> do
> >> >> it?
> >> >> > Is
> >> >> >> it better to make one query and then use CF to parse it
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:337570
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to