I haven't used it in that way no, but as JSON is so widely used (JQUERY for example) I would imagine it can cope with anything.
Russ -----Original Message----- From: Dan Baughman [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 07 December 2010 00:43 To: cf-talk Subject: Re: CFWDDX Serialization and Deserialization Yea I'm remembering why I chose to use cfwddx when I build this specific app, but I'm wishing I had used something else like that. Have you used that much with international or special character sets, writing to database, etc? Before I change serialization techniques I want to find the right one this time. On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Russ Michaels <[email protected]> wrote: > > Could you use CFJSON instead > > http://cfjson.riaforge.org/ > > Russ > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Baughman [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 06 December 2010 21:24 > To: cf-talk > Subject: CFWDDX Serialization and Deserialization > > > It has recently (and very painfully) come to my attention that cfwddx > serialize doesn't encapsulate strings in CDATA markers. > > This removes your ability to have HTML/XML markup in a string that is part > of a struct you are trying to serialize/deserialize with out paying special > attention to each string at serialization and deserialization time. > > Is there something I'm missing? This would seem to be an incredibly useful > feature that would save tons of work and make the serialization feature > tons > more useful. > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:339871 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
