Mark, would that be as effective on a shared server ? what benefits over the default GC does it provide ?
Russ On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Mark A. Kruger <[email protected]>wrote: > > Wil, > > I rather like the low pause collector combined with the UseParNewGC. It > works quite well for us on our high traffic multi-instance servers. > > -Mark > > -----Original Message----- > From: Wil Genovese [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 11:02 AM > To: cf-talk > Subject: Re: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space > > > I have never tried to run two garbage collectors. I'm not sure that is a > good idea. On multi-cpu/core servers I have only used -XX:+UseParallelGC > > Also, the default time the GC runs is once per minute. This may or may not > work for your application. To adjust that use the settings below. They are > set to 10 minutes. Again, adjust the numbers to suite the needs of the > server and application. > > -Dsun.rmi.dgc.client.gcInterval=600000 > -Dsun.rmi.dgc.server.gcInterval=600000 > > > > Wil Genovese > Sr. Web Application Developer/ > Systems Administrator > CF Webtools > www.cfwebtools.com > > [email protected] > www.trunkful.com > > On Mar 28, 2011, at 10:48 AM, tom vallee wrote: > > > > > i should replace -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC and -XX:+UseParNewGC or only > -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC > > > > with : XX:+UseParallelGC > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:343355 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
