CF901 added the ability to use ORM with N datasources. On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Carl Von Stetten <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am thinking about refactoring a few applications of mine to use ORM. > One problem that I think I will have is that the applications talk to > multiple databases (in the vast majority of cases, the application only > reads data, it does not write data). It's a data integration > application that ties together data from numerous databases (a mixture > of SQL Server databases on at least three different servers, and a > database on an IBM AS400 server via java drivers from IBM - I don't > expect ORM to work with the IBM database). As I understand it (and I > use that term loosely :-[ ), the ORM built in to CF9 will connect to > only one database. Is this correct? If so, are there any other ORM > alternatives that would support the requirement of working with multiple > databases? Or for a primarily read-only application, is ORM overkill? > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:345048 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
