>On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 2:29 AM, Eugene Colucci wrote: >>> Out of curiosity, at that point why not use 64-bit CF on your 64-bit >>> server? >> >> Fear of the unknown. > >Conquer your fears :) Unless you still use 32-bit stuff (COM, MS >Access, 32-bit CFX tags) 64-bit CF is actually easier to install on >Win64 than 32-bit CF. > > > >Yes. > >Jochem > > >-- >Jochem van Dieten >http://jochem.vandieten.net/
In fact, we do have a mixed bag of data sources ranging from Oracle 11g to Microsoft SQL to 32-bit Microsoft Access. I read a little about driver issues some people had and don't want to face that potential problem in addition to the other problems I know I have to face especially since I am under some time constraints to have this new CF server satisfactorily functional. However with ColdFusion 10 (?) on the horizon, we might make our CF 64-bit upgrade concurrent with our CF version upgrade; we'll see. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:349034 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
