Agreed and someone could always write themselves some custom functions as wrappers to CF tags for prior versions CF or perhaps even what is missing in the current. To a point at least. I have been a CFScript Nazi for well over a decade now but fully recognize a place for it and a place for when to use the tags. I very rarely use it for outputting things and can't say I really have had a need for much of the added tags-to-functions introduced in CF9. We though have many pre-CF9 servers so also does not make too much sense for me to write anything specific to CF9.
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 5:05 AM, Scott Brady <dsbr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > As of CF9, the vast majority of CF can be written in script, if you > desire. Almost every tag has a cfscript equivalent (I believe there were a > few that didn't make the cut, but I can't recall which ones off-hand). Of > course, some things are a bit more tedious doing them in script (such as > outputting content and running queries). > > Scott > > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Robert Rhodes <rrhode...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > I do wish Adobe would fill out CF so that one could write mostly in > > cfscript and avoid cf tags altogether, if desired. It would also help > when > > I end up around small-minded coders who scoff at CF merely because of the > > tags.On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Cameron Childress < > > > > > > -- > ----------------------------------------- > Scott Brady > http://www.scottbrady.net/ > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:349993 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
