Thanks Cameron, that makes sense. I agree with Dave's position and guess I should have pointed out I do not have a valid use case for this, but only trying to sort through the limitations of a question posed to me.
Thanks, Dan On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Cameron Childress <camer...@gmail.com>wrote: > > Dan- > > As Dave pointed out, I'd typically make a standard assumption in most > design that each subtype would automatically call super on extended methods > / interfaces. This would mean that each level would contain the > super.makeSound() to chain them all together as you go up the path > of inheritance. > > -Cameron > > On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Dan O'Keefe <dan.oke...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Thanks Matt, > > > > That's true, but super is limited to only one level I believe. How about > if > > I wanted to execute the method in the animal object? > > > > Dan > > > > > -- > Cameron Childress > -- > p: 678.637.5072 > im: cameroncf > facebook <http://www.facebook.com/cameroncf> | > twitter<http://twitter.com/cameronc> | > google+ <https://profiles.google.com/u/0/117829379451708140985> > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:351797 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
