no, see my previous notes RE Helicon Zoo module On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Michael David <[email protected]>wrote:
> > Yeah -- all MS servers (IIS 7.5). > > Is that a problem? > -- > Cheers! > Michael David > > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "Matt Quackenbush" <[email protected]> > To: "cf-talk" <[email protected]> > Sent: 8/20/2012 9:23:36 AM > Subject: Re: CF10 vs Railo > >On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Michael David < > >[email protected] > >>wrote: > > > > > >> > >> > >>So -- the new CF licensing policy has me thinking.... > >> > >>Anyone out there using Railo in a a high volume production environment? > >> Using beefy hardware, I have been able to avoid the need to cluster so > >>far. So, how is Railo's performance? > >> > >> > > > > > > > >Unless you're doing something like a lot of Microsoft or PDF integration, > >Railo will obliterate ACF in performance. Every time. All the time. > >Period. You'll need wwwwwwwwwwwwaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyy less hardware > >with Railo. > > > > > > > > > >> > >>The thing I need most is dependability. I don't just have time to > >>babysit temperamental installs. Is Railo rock-solid? > >> > >> > > > > > > > >Hell yes. > > > > > > > > > >> > >>And what about security? > >> > >> > > > > > > > >Not sure what exactly you're getting at, but Railo is at least as "secure" > >as ACF. In just a basic installation, I'd venture to say that Railo is > more > >secure, as each Railo instance provides sandboxing out of the box, giving > a > >"Web Administrator" to each project/application. But to really answer your > >question, we'd need a much more detailed question (or series of > questions). > > > > > > > > > >> > >>How is its cfscript implementation? I am on a mission to avoid tags to > >>the extent possible, except when rendering html. > >> > >> > > > > > > > >Railo's cfscript implementation beats the hell out of ACF's, and has for > >years. > > > >Go run this on ACF. Then install Railo and give it a whirl. :-) > > > ><cfscript> > > foo = { > > x:'yay!', > > y:'hooray!', > > z:'rock on, Railo!' > > } > > writeDump( foo ) > ></cfscript> > > > > > > > > > >> > >>I checked out Railo's unsupported tags and functions, and only > >>cfspreadsheet is a problem, but I see that there is > >>an extension out there. I often have the need to output data into > >>multiple sheets within one file... > >> > >> > > > > > > > >I don't do much with cfspreadsheet, so I don't know if that's a deal > >breaker or not. I can say that the extension has done what I needed and > >done it well the handful of times I've needed that functionality. > > > ><opinion> > > > >Bottom line. The future of CFML *is* Railo. > > > ></opinion> > > > >HTH! > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:352216 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
