As I said, your solution seems to work perfectly for all the feeds that were causing problems. Some have comments at the top, some at the bottom. In one case I couldn't see any comments at all but it seems to work anyway.
I will post a bug report about this as suggested, it seems to me like CFFeed could just strip out any comments before parsing the feed. Thanks again for your help with this. On 6 August 2013 13:05, Raymond Camden <[email protected]> wrote: > > What's fascinating is that as far as I can see, the second URL doesn't have > a comment. Just saving it locally works. I bet the same works for the first > URL too. To be clear, I was able to parse the XML just fine with cfhttp, so > it is valid XML. If you want to work with that and not the cffeed result, > you can skip the file save. > > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Raymond Camden <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > You may want to file a bug report for this too. Although the first feed > > URL fails to validate here http://validator.w3.org/feed/. > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 6:59 AM, Raymond Camden <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > >> Another option is to remove the comment from the source XML. > >> Unfortunately, cffeed doesn't let you source via a string, so you have > to > >> save it still. > >> > >> <cfset u = " > >> http://www.computerweekly.com/rss/All-Computer-Weekly-content.xml";> > >> > >> > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:356392 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
