-----Original Message-----
From: Al Hepworth 
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 12:59
To: kwasi
Subject: RE: The Implications of using ColdFusion To Interact with MTS
and COM .


Dave
Thanks for your comments. 


<You_said>With MTS and COM+ specifically, CF can't declare a "transactional
page" like
ASP can, so you'll lose some transaction functionality.</You_said>

In my limited understanding of MTS, I think this is when an ASP pages
declares itself as the base MTS client. Have you hit this problem in
practice and determined a work around? Maybe you could create a proxy base
MTS client and pass all object calls through this (sounds a bit of a mung) ?

Perhaps Allaire are fixing these issues for a subsequent release of CF.

I'd like to be able to use the powerful features of n-tier dev without
having to go back to ASP.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: kwasi 
> Sent: 16 January 2001 10:13
> To: Developers
> Subject: FW: The Implications of using ColdFusion To Interact with MTS
> and COM .
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 03:43
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: The Implications of using ColdFusion To Interact with MTS
> and COM .
> 
> 
> > Do you have an idea of how often the problems with specific 
> > datatypes expected by COM object occurs in practice ? 
> 
> It's been relatively infrequent in my experience. If you're 
> writing your own
> COM objects, which you would be if you were building your own 
> n-tier app,
> you could write them in a way that would avoid any problems.
> 
> > Also it would be useful to know in advance exactly what kind 
> > of trouble we can expect from ".. dealing with object hierarchies."
> 
> This is primarily a difficulty with interfaces provided by 
> the operating
> system, such as ADSI. You generally can't use them effectively from
> CFOBJECT.
> 
> > Are there any work arounds for these kind of issues such as 
> > wrapping the COM object in a VB adaptor?
> 
> You can write wrappers to address any of these problems, but 
> wrappers will
> affect performance. This wouldn't be an issue for 
> applications built to
> manage the interfaces mentioned above, but it would be for 
> n-tier apps.
> 
> Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
> http://www.figleaf.com/
> voice: (202) 797-5496
> fax: (202) 797-5444
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to