Hi Kevin,
in general you can say that CFINCLUDE is faster than CFMODULE which is
faster than CF_Custom Tag. If you really plan to switch to fusebox, my
advice would be to go for the includes.
HTH,
Chris
> -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Kevin Gilchrist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 30. Januar 2001 18:07
> An: CF-Talk
> Betreff: Performance question - CFINCLUDE versus writing a custom CF
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm writing a web app that acts as a dashboard for an MSP, i.e. a GUI that
> shows the status of all sorts of applications, network and host
> devices. I
> need to write quite a few select queries for each device/host/app type, so
> will end up with ~150 different queries.
>
> What I'm wondering about is if anyone has any thoughts on whether it's
> better to access these queries from the GUI templates using
>
> - a series of conditional CFINCLUDE's that would include a smallish query
> template.
>
> - or write a custom CF tag with all the queries inside and pass three
> parameters that would give me a unique query name. A three deep CFWITCH
> statement could home in on the relevant query.
>
> Is it correct to assume that it's a bigger hit on CF to call on a
> relatively
> large templates even though it's doesn't have to process much of it (cf_
> tag), as opposed to including whole but small templates?
> I guess it may be better organizationally to implement the queries as a
> bunch of small files to include?
>
> It seems like a case of six in one, half a dozen in the other but
> I'll never
> know if I don't ask...
>
> Thanks,
> Kevin
>
> P.S. I intend to convert it all to fusebox for version 2.
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
