Just a few that I'm aware of (I'm not all that familiar with iHTML):
iHTML runs in the address space of the web server (not as a separate
service). So, iHTML would be more prone to taking down a web server than
CF.
iHTML does not support COM (not sure if it supports CORBA but I doubt it).
iHTML does not have native clustering.
iHTML does not support template encryption.
Custom tags are almost non-existant. iHTML supports extensions (iHTX) but
there are no good examples from Inline nor is there a "developer's exchange"
where you can acquire custom tags. There is a code exchange of sorts,
though.
A few iHTML pluses that I know of:
Multi-platform support (Windows, Unix)
Devoted community (like the CF community)
You get questions answered directly from the iHTML developers consistently
(Inline).
Strong motivation by Inline to support free and open standards (Open ODBC,
MySQL, etc.)
Less pricey than CF.
HTH,
Howie Hamlin - inFusion Project Manager
On-Line Data Solutions, Inc.
www.CoolFusion.com
631-737-4668 x101
inFusion Mail Server (iMS) - the World's most configurable mail server
Get your free copy of iMS POST-SE Server from CoolFusion!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jaye Morris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 8:24 AM
Subject: Cold Fusion vs. Ihtml
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
> ------=_NextPart_000_009A_01C09271.C598D060
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> I work in a shop that uses Ihtml. People there swear that CF is =
> inferior to
> Ihtml. IS that any data that shows how CF out performs Ihtml or =
> expresses
> the advantages of CF over Ihtml? I would very much appreciate the
> assistance.
>
> Jaye Morris, Interactive Developer, Motion Graphics Design
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.jayezero.com
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Paradox, Humor, and Change - Go Wireless!
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
> ------=_NextPart_000_009A_01C09271.C598D060
> Content-Type: text/html;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
> <HTML><HEAD>
> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
> charset=3Diso-8859-1">
> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2403.0" name=3DGENERATOR>
> <STYLE></STYLE>
> </HEAD>
> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DVerdana color=3D#0000ff size=3D2><STRONG>I work in a =
> shop that uses=20
> Ihtml. People there swear that CF is inferior to<BR>Ihtml. =
> IS that=20
> any data that shows how CF out performs Ihtml or expresses<BR>the =
> advantages of=20
> CF over Ihtml? I would very much appreciate=20
> the<BR>assistance.</STRONG></FONT><BR></DIV>
> <DIV><STRONG><FONT face=3DVerdana color=3D#000080 size=3D2>Jaye =
> Morris, =20
> Interactive Developer, Motion Graphics Design<BR><A=20
> href=3D"mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A><BR><A=20
> href=3D"http://www.jayezero.com">www.jayezero.com</A><BR>++++++++++++++++=
> +++++++++++++++++++<BR>Paradox,=20
> Humor, and Change - Go=20
> Wireless!<BR>+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++<BR></FONT></STRONG></DIV=
> ></BODY></HTML>
>
> ------=_NextPart_000_009A_01C09271.C598D060--
>
>
> Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
