Unless you're using SQL Server 2000, why not use MDAC 2.5? It tried and
true (MDAC 2.6 hosed my machine two days ago). I wouldn't use 2.6 if you
don't have a good reason to do so.
~Simon
Simon Horwith
Allaire Certified Instructor
Certified ColdFusion Developer
Fig Leaf Software
1400 16th St NW, # 220
Washington DC 20036
202.797.6570 (direct line)
www.figleaf.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Adrian Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 6:24 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Which version of MDAC is best with Cold Fusion 4.5.1
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jon Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 10:58 PM
> I use 2.5 on our NT and Win2k boxes with no problems with 4.51. If you go
to
> 4.52 RC2, or whatever the latest version is, it fixes the problems with
MDAC
> 2.6 though.
What_is_the problem with MDAC 2.6?
SQL Server 2000 also installs it by default - or a later release of it.
Adrian Cooper.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
