You probably don't hear much about them because Spectra is the dominant
architecture when it comes to object based development using CF. Although
its not truly object-oriented,
(no classes or inheritance) Spectra espouses objects, properties and
methods - all
common to object-oriented programming.
Tristram Charnley
-----------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"If something is hard to do, its not worth doing!"
Homer Simpson.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erika L Walker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 09 March 2001 02:19
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: CFObjects vs. FuseBox vs. Good CFML Code and SmartObjects
>
>
> Thank you for the real world opinions on the fusebox, it does
> seem to be
> something worth trying again, but has anybody out there ever
> used CFObjects
> and/or SmartObjects? With all this Java hoopla and Object Oriented
> programming we all like to use, why don't I hear anything
> about those two CF
> methods?
>
> Erika
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maia, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 3:55 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: CFObjects vs. FuseBox vs. Good CFML Code and SmartObjects
>
>
> I'll second this - I'm still learning FuseBox methodology,
> but I've found
> that as I implement it more fully, its much easier to make
> changes to my
> code without a major headache. Sure, if you're already following good
> programming practices (simplicity, eliminating duplication,
> code reuse) it
> might not be a major improvement, but I've found it tends to
> enforce good
> practices for those of us who sometimes shortcut them.
>
> I guess one advantage of a Fusebox app over a really
> well-coded app with no
> particular methodology is that another Fusebox developer can
> step in and
> understand the architecture and details of your app more
> quickly due to
> naming and organizational conventions.
>
> eric
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 12:02 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: CFObjects vs. FuseBox vs. Good CFML Code and SmartObjects
>
>
> > I worked on one Fusebox
> > application and it was a little tedious. But probably
> because I was not
> used
> > to the methodology.
>
>
> I can't help on the other methodologies but, being a
> full-time FuseBox fan,
> I can tell you that getting started with it can be a bit
> tedious. It's not
> difficult at all but does require wrapping your mind around
> the concepts
> (there's more to it than comments here usually suggest) and
> then expanding
> them to suit your needs if desired. Once I really started
> taking advantage
> of all it offers I found myself being a LOT more productive overall.
>
> Ken
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
