Mature technology .. Interesting. I guess that answers my question on
whether I should pursue learning or expecting much growth out of WDDX.
Thanks
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marc Garrett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 3:33 PM
Subject: Re: Is WDDX alive & well ?
> I asked precisely the same question to Charles Teague this afternoon at
the
> macromedia UCON. He said that it's an excellent choice for serializing and
> deserializing, as long as you're not really into transformations. When I
> asked him why the web site was so out of date, he said the wddx is a
mature
> (complete) technology.
>
> Regards,
>
> Marc Garrett
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tracy Bost" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 9:00 AM
> Subject: Is WDDX alive & well ?
>
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
