i guess i should've chosen my terminology more carefully. i'm not doing a
literal migration in the sense of migrating the actual zone or RRs. i'm just
switching products.
MS has been doing DNS since NT 4.0. i recall some problems. but i'm hearing
more and more people are happy with the WIN2K release. i was using MetaInfo
DNS 2.1 for years. then i went to MetaIP 4.1. so now we'll see how MS DNS
2.0 works :). so far, i have to say it's pretty easy.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 10:52 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: OT: DNS
I haven't participated in the specific type of migration you mentioned, but
I can tell you that if you're going to use Active Diretory in Win2K you
should allow AD to install DNS as part of it's own installation (DCPROMO).
It is far more reliable this way. There is a workaround you can use to
migrate DNS records and still do this. Every indication I've seen and heard
so far is that Win2K DNS works well. Which is quite amazing considering how
new Microsoft is to the DNS game!
:-)
Oriole
In a message dated Tue, 17 Apr 2001 12:08:41 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
"Dylan Bromby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
<< i'm planning on migrating from MetaIP to Win2K DNS. has anyone made this
particular migration? any recommendations? has anyone had any trouble with
DNS on Win2K?
tia.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
