I agree. We've had lots of timeout problems where Cybercash would process
the transaction, but take its sweet time. Often the script would time out
before Cybercash got through it. That caused all sorts of stupid problems.
I'd recommend Verisign if I didn't hate them so much (in general, you know:
Network Solutions, stupid privacy policies, spam and the like), because we
haven't really had any problems with them.
--Ben
At 04:15 PM 4/20/2001, you wrote:
>IMHO, they weren't that great to begin with...I've used them on two
>different sites, with *many* processing problems as well as Operational
>problems. Code-wise, it wasn't so bad....I much prefer to use AuthNet, or
>Bank of America - if possible.
>
>now that they are in a *soft* financial situation, well, that could cause
>even bigger headaches for later, on many levels.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: sebastian palmigiani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 3:41 PM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: OT:CyberCash
>
>
>
>I am thinking of using CyberCash. How is their performance and service since
>they have declared bankruptcy?
>
>Sebastian
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
