I'm just going by what I've seen posted here. I've never seen any
documentation saying dynamic variables should be named this way, and there
is a function to do specifically this. A little deduction leads me to
believe that this is an unintended way to go about it. So if it goes away
because the underlying way cfset works, kinda like the old 4.0 bad query of
and access odbc datasource thing.
You probably know better than me though...I'm doing a lot of assuming when
it comes down to it ;-)
jon
----- Original Message -----
From: "Raymond Camden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 10:01 AM
Subject: RE: Setting Dynamic Variables
> Eh? Is it marked for deprecation? If so, it's news to me. (Not saying your
> wrong, just wondering why you think this.)
>
> =======================================================================
> Raymond Camden, Principal Spectra Compliance Engineer for Macromedia
>
> Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ICQ UIN : 3679482
>
> "My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jon Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 9:56 AM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: Re: Setting Dynamic Variables
> >
> >
> > This is not guaranteed to work with future versions of CF.
> > Look into the setVariable() function.
>
>
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
