> Would that work? From a functional standpoint, it's a
> solution. However, politics may trash it. I can imagine people being
> offended that their discussion group is listed on the same page
> as another
> section's discussion group. (Corporate America--or
> wherever--gotta love it)
Tell me about it! This is for a group that has 9 different "branches" that
don't have anything to do with each other with the exception that they all
share the same parent group. Hence the reason that their message boards
need to be separated. I wish I had the time on the project to rebuild the
message forum but I don't, so I think I'm going to do some monkeying with
what I've got already.
> It sounds like a flawed reason to allow anonymous posting,
> kind of like
> a solution to avoid the problem, not solve it.
It's out of my control... but I agree wholeheartedly with you.
> Can 'you'
> dymanically' name
> an application using the CFAPPLICATION tag? I've never even
> thought to try
> it before. Maybe you could use the same discussion group code, but
> automatically log people in by passing the application name as a variable
> into the template. (I.E. you'll have access to all the previous
> session /
> application / client variables)
I've never tried it either, but it does sound like something to play with.
Thanks for the comments!
Hatton Humphrey
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
