Store session info in a database instead of in CF memory.
Robert
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Ross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 9:57 AM
Subject: RE: Windows 2000 NLB
> To anyone that cares I have found that using a Layer 3 switch requires
some extra fiddling with nlb. I have substitued the switch for a 100m hub
and and runs perfectly.
>
> Here is a question though. Regardless of if you use nlb, cc or a hardware
solution. What do you guys do if the server that someone is using (sticky
session) dies and they get moved over to another one. If they are in a
secured area they have to log back in and may lose somethings that they were
doing. What can you do to avoide that?
>
> thanks
>
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/31/01 02:16PM >>>
> NLB is free and worth every penny.
> In your configuration, all traffic is still coming into the first machine
> and then half of that is sent to the other. So one has twice as many
> connections as the second. Where is the real benefit?
>
> You are much better off using ClusterCATS with or without a hardware load
> balancer.
> Set it up with DNS round robin if you can't get a load balancer. There is
a
> bunch of KB articles on this subject at the Allaire site. KB# 18931 is a
> good start.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rob Rusher
>
> Spectra Architect, Certified ColdFusion Instructor + Developer, Certified
> Java Programmer
>
> (303) 885-7044 Cell
> (970) 472-1775 Fax
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.flarenetworks.com
>
>
> plan, build and integrate interactive applications and e-business services
> to enhance knowledge sharing, e-commerce and business communications
> initiatives
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Ross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 12:41 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Windows 2000 NLB
>
>
> I am trying to set up a windows 2000 network load balancing cluster. I
have
> two servers that I am using. At this point in time I have configured
> everything on the two servers. If I get it going it starts to work and
then
> I pull the plug on the #1 priority and #2 takes over. But as soon as I
plug
> # 1 back in the hole things bomb....Its like they are not talking....
> Also in both the event viewer's Its says the "priority number" has joined
as
> default with host(s) "priority number"......blah blah. In both event
> viewers it doesn't see the other one and they both are acting like
defaults.
>
> I have looked and looked at the settings and everythings seems okay.....I
> just put in a new extreme switch and configured the vlan for multicasting.
> I am thinking that maybe it has something to do with the vlan not letting
> them talk?
>
> Any idea's would be great!!
>
> Thanks
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
