> > I was wondering what people think about setting up fusebox as a
> > development standard that everyone has to follow? I agree there
> > should be standards such as naming standards, variable naming
> > conventions, commenting style standards, coding style standards
> > ( indents ) etc...
> > ...
> > What kind of standards does your employer have in place?
>
> I've adopted it as the standard for development. I hire only
> developers who follow that standard.
At Fig Leaf Software, we don't use it as the standard, and hire only
developers who are willing not to use it.
Sorry, but I couldn't resist that.
> Also since CF 5.0 is now out and you can have user defined functions
> and libraries of functions, how does this impact fusebox?
It shouldn't affect Fusebox one way or the other. Keep in mind that
user-defined functions are bound by the significant limitations of CFSCRIPT
anyway.
-------------------
its too bad Allaire didn't decide to use basically the same method calling
functions as they did for calling custom tags
cf_myFuction -> cfml
cfx_myFunction -> c++/java
Duane
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
