Sorry, mea culpa. Just realized my formula should have divided by
1000. Suddenly the ticks work again <g> ...
Gene Kraybill
#Evaluate((EndPageRequest-StartPageRequest)/100)#
On 6 Jul 2001, at 9:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is there a way of using these two tags together on the same page
> and still get accurate Tick results?
>
> Gene Kraybill
>
> On 4 Jul 2001, at 10:02, Craig Dudley wrote:
>
> > It's probably adding the tick counts together for each "interval" of the
> > cfflush
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 03 July 2001 00:35
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: CFFlush and GetTickCount
> >
> >
> > I'm seeing some strange timing reports when I use GetTickCount
> > and CFFlush together... Is this a feature or a bug <g>?
> >
> > I have this at the start of a page:
> > <CFSET StartPageRequest=GetTickCount()>
> >
> > I have this at the end:
> > <CFSET EndPageRequest=GetTickCount()>
> >
> > To calculate the time it takes to generate the page, I use this:
> > #Evaluate((EndPageRequest-StartPageRequest)/100)#
> >
> > When I don't use CFFLUSH on the page, the page generation time
> > is reported at between 5 and 6 seconds.
> >
> > When I do use CFFLUSH, although there is a slight reduction in
> > the delay before the page begins to appear, the page generation
> > time reported by the GetTickCount calculation is much more than
> > the actual time. For example, a page that is generated and fully
> > received by the browser in 13 seconds shows a GetTickCount
> > interval of 41 seconds!
> >
> > Does this mean GetTickCount is never accurate when used within
> > the same page request as CFFlush?
> >
> > Gene Kraybill
> >
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists