Howie Hamlin wrote:
> > 2) the nature of the security problem - obviously MM is going for
> > security-thru-obscurity and is not going to describe the exact problem, but
> > some clue as to the possible effects, how to tell if the weakness has been
> > taken advantage of, etc would be helpful
> >
>
> No idea...in a way it's better that they don't point out the vulnerability.
Bunk. We're talking about a 3-8% performance drop. That's big enough
to warrant an explanation and possible workarounds. They could at least
talk about it in some more specific terms.
>
> Regards,
>
> Howie Hamlin - inFusion Project Manager
> On-Line Data Solutions, Inc.
> www.CoolFusion.com
> 631-737-4668 x101
> inFusion Mail Server (iMS) - The Intelligent Mail Server
> Join the DevCon community at www.coolfusion.com/devcon
>
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Phil Costa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 8:50 AM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: Important ColdFusion Security Patch Released Today
--
Edward Smith Internet Broadcasting System
Director of Architecture http://www.ibsys.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
