Does anyone know what product you need to qualify for the Studio upgrade?

<br><br><br>Mark Smeets/stranger0/ICQ #1062196

My new email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

"Mr. West, not every situation requires your patented approach of shoot 
first, shoot later, shoot some more and then when everybody's dead try to 
ask a question or two" - Wild Wild West

A Stranger's Domain
http://24.113.34.178/stranger

Official Splitting Adam Homepage
http://www.splittingadam.com/



>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (CF-Talk)
>Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: CF-Talk-list V1 #64
>Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 06:25:38 -0400
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from [207.31.122.190] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id 
>MHotMailBD2D2F27007F40043117CF1F7ABE0E560; Sun, 29 Jul 2001 03:23:43 -0700
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 29 Jul 2001 03:24:27 -0700
>Precedence: bulk
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>CF-Talk-list                   Sun, 29 Jul 2001           Volume 1 : Number 
>64
>
>In this issue:
>
>         Re: DateAdd Strangeness? (Or is it me?) --it's you!!
>         Re: Vote on ColdFusion Enhancements!
>         Calling Stored Proc....
>         Re: How do these things happen?
>         RE: Vote on ColdFusion Enhancements!
>         SQL Datatype Datetime
>         Re: SQL Datatype Datetime
>         SQL 7.0 linking Tables to Access
>         Cancel: SQL 7.0 linking Tables to Access
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 20:46:16 -0600
>From: "Jim McAtee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: DateAdd Strangeness? (Or is it me?) --it's you!!
>Message-ID: <008b01c117d8$a3b1fc50$352fa8ce@Jim>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Lee Fuller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2001 12:46 PM
>Subject: RE: DateAdd Strangeness? (Or is it me?) --it's you!!
>
>
> > Yes.. But... (isn't there always one?? ;)
> >
> > You're correct.. Except that a "Quarter", when used in calendar terms,
> > means Jan-Mar, Apr-Jun, Jul-Sep, and Oct-Dec.  So by using the first
> > test, with "now()" as the date it answers correctly.  However, when
> > using a random date, it does not... It simply adds 3 months.
> >
> > Maybe it's just me assuming that "quarter" is for "calendar quarter".
> > But when someone says "Q1 2001".. We all assume they mean Jan-Mar of
> > 2001.  And if you add 1 to the Q1, you get Q2, which is Apr-Jun of 2001.
> >
> > Oddly enough.. If you use "Quarter(now())" it returns the number based
> > on calendar quarters.  So if you're trying to modify a date to get the
> > next "calendar" quarter.. It would be simple to use the dateadd to add a
> > quarter and voila!  But.. Sadly it doesn't work that way.  :(
>
>
>Maybe your confusion lies within the fact that DateAdd() works with dates,
>not quarters.  DateAdd("q", n, date) quite simply adds multiples of three
>months to the date argument.  As such, it's somewhat redundant.  It would
>seem more than a little confusing if adding one "quarter" to June 26, 2001
>returned a date of July 1, 2001.
>
>If you want to add quarters to a date, and return the beginning month of 
>the
>resulting quarter, you could use the following:
>
><cfset m = Quarter(DateAdd("q", 1, somedate)) * 3 - 2>
>
>Jim
>
>
>
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
>http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 22:54:40 -0400
>From: "Bill Davidson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Vote on ColdFusion Enhancements!
>Message-ID: <002c01c117d9$cff3fba0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Yeah, I am well aware of it, thanks. There's just a few things I think 
>could
>benefit from the voting system.  I really appreciate the MM people putting
>this up for CF.  It shows that at least they appear to care, which makes me
>happy!  Beta testing and feature requests should not go together.  The last
>thing you need when you are trying to fix something is a new feature to 
>come
>along and break something else.
>
>However I'd be more than happy to dive into formal beta testing of the new
>Studio.... I am where I am today from working with software companies to
>develop their products - literally.  I worked so closely with a company 
>that
>I beta test with that I ended up in their office space for almost 2 years,
>which decided where brainbox would be born.
>
>Best regards.
>-Bill
>www.brainbox.tv
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Peter Tilbrook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2001 7:46 PM
>Subject: RE: Vote on ColdFusion Enhancements!
>
>
> > Bill, Macromedia are working on the new version (5.0) right now.
> >
> > Check out "http://beta.allaire.com";.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill
> > Davidson
> > Sent: Sunday, 29 July 2001 1:47 AM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: Re: Vote on ColdFusion Enhancements!
> >
> >
> > Terry - can you add a category for Studio (or tell me where it is)?  I
>know
> > it's a different product, but there are some issues there, I would love 
>to
> > see addressed.
> >
> > Regards.
> > -Bill
> > www.brainbox.tv
> >
> >
> >
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
>http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 23:28:30 -0400
>From: "BT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Calling Stored Proc....
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>I'm getting  SQL/ODBC Error when incorporating the following CF code and
>Stored Procedure... Anyone had this?
>There are not triggers as well...
>
>Error:
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
>http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 00:53:35 -0400
>From: Jim Finucane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: How do these things happen?
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Bud,
>
>I had a similar problem with more that one site in the past. I finally
>figured it out (quite by accident)
>when I was testing some error handling on a form submission. I entered
>some garbage input and submitted the
>form  on the resulting test page I was outputting the list
>Form.fieldnames on the top of the page and I discovered
>that all the fields did not show up. I looked back at my garbage input
>and saw that the submission was cut off at
>an & character that I entered in one of the text fields. I tested this
>several times and found that whatever field I
>entered an & character would cut of the rest of the form fields as if
>they had not been submitted at all.
>I do not know if this is a CF specific problem in how it deals with form
>posts ( is the & some kind of escape char?)
>or something else (IIS HTTP). I meant to look into this further but
>never got around to doing it.
>
>Run a few tests putting a & into different input fields and see if you
>can duplicate the error.
>Let me know if this was the problem.
>
>
>Regards,
>
>Jim
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Bud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2001 9:02 AM
>Subject: How do these things happen?
>
>
> > Man. I come across stuff like this and it simply makes me dizzy
> > trying to figure out what is wrong.
> >
> > While looking at my errors log, I find a bunch of these:
> >
> > The QUERY attribute of the tag does not specify the name of an
> > available query<p>The error occurred while processing an element with
> > a general identifier of (CFOUTPUT), occupying document position
> > (50:6) to (50:43) in the template file
> > F:\USERS\LATIN-LOVECONNECTION\HTDOCS\SEARCH\DETAILS.CFM.
> >
> > OK, so at that document position is a cfoutput tag with a query of
> > itemsLong. Above that are 2 queries called itemsLong, the one that
> > runs depending upon the category ID that's passed. The referer that's
> > specified in the rror is correct, so they're not just going there
> > without clicking the form button, which will pass the hidden
> > category_id field. Whenever I go to the page, itemsLong is run.
> >
> > Stuff like this makes me nuts. There is absolutely no rhyme nor
> > reason for it other than CF deciding "well, I just won't run the
> > block of code with the query in it".
> > --
> >
> > Bud Schneehagen - Tropical Web Creations
> >
> > _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
> > ColdFusion Solutions / eCommerce Development
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://www.twcreations.com/
> > 954.721.3452
> >
> >
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
>http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 15:02:21 +1000
>From: "Peter Tilbrook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Vote on ColdFusion Enhancements!
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Bill... Agreed!
>
>I just finished downloading the latest build of Studio 5 (beta 2) on a 
>33.6K
>connection. I'm that keen!
>
>About to start using it to see if the promised improvements are there.
>
>Some comments in the forums appear to want something totally "new" for
>Studio. I disagree. It has a fine pedigree started with Nick Bradbury's
>HomeSite product. Most long-term CF developers started with Studio 3.1 at
>least. 4.01 was good. 4.5 faltered with some major bugs (zero byte file
>saves my major problem. 4.5.2 appears/appeared to be rock solid although 
>the
>zero byte file save occurred occasionally.
>
>If it isn't broken don't fix it. HomeSite/Studio is a great project based
>code/HTML editor.
>Version 5.0 of both appear to be on the right track.
>
>
>
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
>http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 15:38:06 +1000
>From: "Andrew Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: SQL Datatype Datetime
>Message-ID: 
><!~[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Is it possible to have a null Datetime field although I have allowed
>nulls, it still complains. Or would it be better to have a very distant
>past date...
>
>
>
>
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
>http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 23:48:15 -0600
>From: "Jim McAtee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: SQL Datatype Datetime
>Message-ID: <00e501c117f2$0fb94890$352fa8ce@Jim>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Andrew Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2001 11:38 PM
>Subject: SQL Datatype Datetime
>
>
> >
> > Is it possible to have a null Datetime field although I have allowed
> > nulls, it still complains. Or would it be better to have a very distant
> > past date...
>
>
>Have you tried inserting the value NULL, or are you using a zero length
>string?
>
>Jim
>
>
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
>http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 07:56:35 +0100
>From: "Jerry Staple" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: SQL 7.0 linking Tables to Access
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Hi
>       Can any one inform me of a way to link from a SQL Db to an
>access db table?The access table in future will be transfered to SQL
>7,but not yet. I know about the import etc but i would like the SQL
>database to be linked to a live Access Table.
>
>
>Any Ideas??????
>
>Jerry Staple
>
>Web Applications Developer
>BizNet Solutions
>133 - 137 Lisburn Rd
>Belfast
>BT9 7AG
>
>Tel: +44 (0)28 9022 3224
>Fax: +44 (0)28 9022 3223
>www.biznet-solutions.com
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
>http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 08:21:43 +0100
>From: "Jerry Staple" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Cancel: SQL 7.0 linking Tables to Access
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Sorted!
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jerry Staple
>Sent: 29 July 2001 07:57
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: SQL 7.0 linking Tables to Access
>
>
>Hi
>       Can any one inform me of a way to link from a SQL Db to an
>access db table?The access table in future will be transfered to SQL
>7,but not yet. I know about the import etc but i would like the SQL
>database to be linked to a live Access Table.
>
>
>Any Ideas??????
>
>Jerry Staple
>
>Web Applications Developer
>BizNet Solutions
>133 - 137 Lisburn Rd
>Belfast
>BT9 7AG
>
>Tel: +44 (0)28 9022 3224
>Fax: +44 (0)28 9022 3223
>www.biznet-solutions.com
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
>http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
>
>------------------------------
>
>End of CF-Talk-list V1 #64
>**************************
>FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
>Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
>


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to