What stress tool? Heavy database load? What functionality? What
platform? Any advanced functionality (like CFObject, CFFTP, etc)
I think that 4.5 could be a little faster due to the additional services
5 must run (Generator, Jrun). Whatever minimal advantage 4.5 may have
is easily negated by 5's improvements.
- query of a query : cut query time down
- UDF's - can replace time-intensive custom tags in many instances
- CFFTP actually works
- any scaling benefits?
- any stability benefits?
---
Billy Cravens
HR Systems, EDS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----Original Message-----
From: Henry Ahn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 9:17 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF 4.5 and CF 5 comparison
it was run on the same machine with the exact same stress test program
and settings.
i ran the test with 4.5 then installed 5 then ran the test again. then
i retested on 5 then reinstalled 4.5 and got similar results. 4.5 won
by a smidgen in both cases.
Henry Ahn
NextJump, Inc.
-----Original Message-----
From: Aidan Whitehall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 9:45 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF 4.5 and CF 5 comparison
> I just did a comparison stress test between the 2 servers and
> it looks like
> 4.5 was similar and in most cases beat version 5.
Aside from CFAS, were all other things equal on both servers (processor,
RAM, users hitting the box, etc)?
Aidan
--
Aidan Whitehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Macromedia ColdFusion Developer
Fairbanks Environmental +44 (0)1695 51775
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
