I'd copy it into the request scope (be SURE to use Duplicate() since it's a complex variable, and be sure to get the Duplicate Hot Fix for CF). No need to lock the request scope. Chris Norloff ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- from: "Tim Dempsey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 10:13:37 -0400 >Folks, > >I have a (possibly) huge structure being maintained in Session scope. I am >in the process of making sure that I have all the appropriate locks when >referring to the structure. > >My question is this: > >One of my templates makes a number of references (some read only, some >write) to this structure. Is it better for me (performance-wise) to make a >duplicate of the session structure in the Request scope and place the locks >around that copy thereby no longer needing locks around the other >references, Or is it better just to put locks on all the other references? >Is this simply a matter of how many references there ans some number of them >make a break-even point? > >Thanks, > -- Tim Dempsey > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
