> I couldn't say structure.substructure.#Evaluate("#xxxxx#")
You could say:
evaluate("structure.substructure." & xxxxx)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Dempsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 23 August 2001 15:39
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Structure notation
>
>
> Folks,
>
> Perhaps the collective wisdom of the list can enlighten me
> about the syntax
> available to reference structure elements.
>
> In Cold Fusion manuals and Studio help as well as in the Ben
> Forta books the
> way to reference elements of a structure is given as
>
> structure_name["element_name"]
>
> But I have seen examples of structure_name.element_name being
> allowed and
> now I see that the new O'Reilly ColdFusion book lists object
> notation like
> that as one of the ways to reference structure elements.
>
> Is this something new or has it always been available. Why
> doesn't the CF
> manuals or help mention it? Is there any danger in using
> object notation.
>
> Is either one the preferred notation for any reason? Better
> performance?
> More accepted style? etc. etc.
>
> I found one case where the bracket notation seemed to be
> required: the name
> of the element was itself a variable, specifically, the result of a
> function. For example:
>
> <cfset structure.substructure['#Evaluate("##xxxxx##")#'] = ......>
>
> I couldn't say structure.substructure.#Evaluate("#xxxxx#")
>
> How come?
>
> Thanks for any insight you can give.
>
>
> -- Tim Dempsey
>
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
