Yes, it is there. I just viewed it. Did you put the
URL back together?
--- "Brunt, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just a footnote, that page is no longer there!!
>
> Kind Regards - Mike Brunt
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeffry Houser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 8:54 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: OT .NET: ActiveX in Disguise? FUD alert
>
>
> Fear, Uncertainty, and doubt .
>
>
> At 03:49 PM 09/13/2001 -0400, you wrote:
> >What does FUD mean?
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Jon Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 2:02 PM
> >To: CF-Talk
> >Subject: Re:OT .NET: ActiveX in Disguise? FUD alert
> >
> >
> >Totally off topic, but as someone who likes .Net,
> I'll just say this is
> >obvious. I myself have described .Net as a super
> COM object that comes
> >with windows. If someone is critical of .Net as
> didn't know this
> >already, they really dont have enough information
> to form any useful
> >opinion. It would be an opinion based in ignorance.
> The article is FUD,
> >plain and simple. The author doesn't even fully
> grasp the concept of
> >what ActiveX is.
> >
> >jon
> >
> >Jackson Moore (CFTalk) wrote:
> >
> > >In case you haven't seen it, this article came
> out on Monday on
> > > computerworld.com and in their newsletters. For
> those of you
> > > who are critical of .net and want some more
> material to back up
> > > your position, here you go:
> > >
> >
>
>http://www.computerworld.com/rckey11/story/0,1199,NAV63_STO63605,
> > >00.html
> > >
> > >Jackson Moore
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists