> Very likely some third-party site that was simply a NS cobrand - > remember all the fuss when MSN was using a Career Builder > co-brand, and CB was using CF? There was a lot of FUD about > MS using CF - which really wasn't the case.
MS has used CF in the past, though. The portion of MS that deals with web presence and web "properties" has been pretty agnostic about what gets used, interestingly enough. For example, if I remember correctly, MS bought Submit-IT, which was originally written long ago using CF (1.5 or 2) and Perl! For a long time, it still appeared to use CF - it was changed to ASP pretty recently when it was rebuilt. That's hardly a condemnation by MS of their own web products, but simply pragmatism. Why rebuild something that already works? Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
