Tage Widsell wrote: > on 01-11-01 16.10, Jochem van Dieten at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>Tage Widsell wrote: >> > We don't use sandboxing. I need a role based log-in system that enables me > to control what information goes where. We have groups like allUsers, > RegisteredUser, betaTesters, admins and registered owners of our products. > Apart from the basic server security that wouldn't be handled by this system > - to stop people from breaking into the server and modify/damage data, the > nightmare would be if someone could find a way to pose as a site admin and > get access to product registration, serial numbers etc.
As long as you don't anticipate the need for clustering session variables should be OK. >>>Also, one of the problems I had in 4.0.1 was locking the shared scope >>>variables. This seems to be much more efficient in CF 5, but I also found >>>the option to run Single Threaded Sessions. This seems like a very easy >>>solution. Would this affect performance a lot? >>> >> >>Yes. >> >> > > So I would be stupid not to set <cflock> around every shared variable? Ouch. "Highly recommended" sounds better ;) Jochem ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
