Scott, I hear you, and honestly, I don't know why it was done that way originally. This entire thread is being forwarded to the right folks within MM.
--- Ben -----Original Message----- From: Scott Brady [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 5:27 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Single user CF5 license available BF wrote (can I call ya BF?): > Scott, that was the same for the prior version too. It is intended for use > with Studio. > > --- Ben The same for the previous version of the single user license? If so, then fine. They should release a version 5 of CFExpress. They have a lot of users who develop at home, (but don't host at home), and don't want to be forced to purchase CF Studio in order to do so. I mean, we're not even talking about a product they sell (single-user version of the server) and it's not usable in a production environment. If someone is stupid enough to actually host from home while using it, then they risk getting caught with a simple visit to Netcraft. I love Cold Fusion and I'm quite good at it (not trying to sound arrogant, really). But, I'm also good enough to switch to a non-MM technology [I've been learning ASP and am learning JSP, which doesn't require JRun], which would allow me to develop at home without shelling out $500 for a program that has more features than I really need for home development. (I'm not trying to harass you, Ben, since you're just the Evangelist.) I'd even be happy with letting HomeSite users (at $100, that's at least much more reasonable) use the single-user license. Scott -------------------------------------------- Scott Brady http://www.scottbrady.net/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
