Hey! I like our codenames... (Except I'm not allowed to name things after
anime characters...)

========================
Jesse Noller
Linux Fiend
Macromedia Server Development
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"Give a man a fish, and he'll pester you to keep giving him fish. Teach a
man to fish, and he'll pester you for better fishing theory".
--Me, 2001

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Carabetta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 10:55 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Is CF 5 ready for production?
> 
> 
> 1. Neo is the next release of ColdFusion, where Macromedia will be 
> re-writing the CF engine from C++ to Java. To save you the 
> question, you 
> will not have to learn Java to use Neo. It will still be the 
> same tag-based 
> language you use today. However, to extend CF (i.e., custom 
> tags, etc.), a 
> knowledge of Java would benefit.
> 
> 2. Why is it called Neo? I would guess two reasons. First, 
> because "neo" 
> means "new" and this product will be a new direction, even 
> though it's still 
> CF. Second, I also think it's because someone at Macromedia 
> has a fetish 
> with "The Matrix." Just to clarify that point, their next 
> suite of tools is 
> called "Trinity," so put that with "Neo" and you have 
> somebody who needs to 
> get out more.
> 
> 3. Macromedia (who bought Allaire) is behind the product.
> 
> 4. As you can tell by the previous answers, CF isn't going 
> anywhere. In 
> fact, I firmly believe it's going to be a viable alternative 
> to .NET and 
> other platforms, assuming Macromedia delivers on the features 
> it's been 
> touting for the last year or so.
> 
> Hope this helps,
> Dave.
> 
> 
> ----Original Message Follows----
> From: John McCosker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: Is CF 5 ready for production?
> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 15:34:45 -0000
> 
>  >Macromedia's logic behind this is that they feel CF 5 is a 
> stable enough
>  >product that they'd rather have all of their developers 
> focusing on Neo,
>  >rather than service packs for a code base that they are effectively
>  >abandoning.
> 
> Sorry for this but,
> 
> What exactly is Neo?
> Why is it called Neo?
> Who is behind Neo? (i.e. is it the same people behind CF)
> What happen's after CF5 (..gone forever..?)
> 
> Could you define?
>  >code base that they are effectively abandoning
> 
> jmc
> .
> 
> 
> 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to