Sorry. My experience is otherwise. Not that I've done a major amount of testing. Maybe I should do more. I'm generally happy with the performance of CF and haven't felt the need to skin performance to the minimum.
When you think about it, your example makes no sense. Five users with five sessions are going to run on five threads. If your site doesn't use frames, then the "single threaded sessions" setting is going to have virtually no effect. The only difference is the minimal amount of code that CF would need to check session ID's and block the second thread within a session--and, as I have said, the blocking would only occur in the rare case of a framed document loading two windows simultaneously. The extra code necessary to check for a multi-request session is going to be significantly less than the code required to parse and execute the <CFLOCK> tags. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kwang Suh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 1:50 PM Subject: Re: Complete lack of locking... > Not urban legend. > > We had the dev server here on "single threaded sessions". > > One user: good speed > Two users: average speed > Three users: slow > Four users: very slow > Five users: craaaaawwwwllll > > This was bad. Very bad. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
