Thanks Tony, Thats pretty much what I had presumed
Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: Tony Schreiber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 23 November 2001 14:19 > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: Load balancing with hardware solution - still require > Enterprise? > > > No, you don't need lb/failover services of Enterprise with a hardware load > balancer... > > At my last big site we used a Foundry lb with several webservers. If you > use session variables, be sure to use the datasource method rather than > registry - this was a user can pass from machine to machine without issue. > > We setup each machine to mount a shared webroot from a fileserver, so that > there were no code "distribution" issues, all machines used the same > webroot. Also, each machine was addressable at its own unique hostname, > but since the load balancer answered as "www", we were able to use the > same ssl certificate (www.domain.com) on each machine with error (unless > you hit it with its hostname specifically). > > > I was wondering if I passed the job of load balancing to a third party > > hardware solution, do I still need to use Enterprise? > > > > TIA, > > Dave > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
