In my application, the users have no choice but to go through the 
system, so
I don't need to worry about driving off customers, but I certainly 
don't
want to complicate the user experience any more than I have to.  I see 
the
problem with presenting form after form to a user who thought it would 
only
take a few minutes to go through.  In my own experience, I've always
appreciated the wizard style forms that indicated what step I was on 
with
tabs or something.  Even if it just says "Step 2 of 4" or something, I 
think
it gives a cleaner idea.  Since my steps are each very simple, I think 
that
I'll avoid irking the majority of the masses.  At least I hope so.  
Gulp.

Thanks again for your input.

Matthieu

-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 1:27 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: multi-page forms 


Matthieu penned:
> It does seem logical to me that the completion rate for a long 
> single-page form would be different from that of a multi-page form.  
> I am a little confused, though, because the long form that you 
> propose, Matt, even though it is actually one long form, appears 
> to the user as though it is a multi-page form.  So the difference 
> in completion rate cannot fairly be attributed to difference in 
> user experience.  Does that sound right to you?  If not, please 
> let me know.  I may have misunderstood something.

The long form I referenced was the one found at
http://64.37.102.68/online/onlinequote.html.  The designer took my big
single form and broke it up.  When I saw the designer's work I objected
to it, and wanted to prove it was a bad idea, though I thought his
method of accomplishing the job -- the single long hoppity-hopping form
bit -- was interesting (he did this, BTW, to make his multipart concept
work with the existing CF coding).

The form was running on several sites.  I built a multipart ver and put
it on some of them.  Completion rates promptly collapsed.  

Your users may not object to this the way mine did.  I don't know what
your application is, but for my particular one being up-front about all
the info required to get a result was a better idea.

If you *want* a multi-page form, that method may be a simple solution 
as
long as your needs are also simple. As Andrew pointed out, field
validation and user confusion are issues you have to consider as well.
It may make more sense to validate at each step, and that means this
long-form bit won't work.

--Matt Robertson--
MSB Designs, Inc.
http://mysecretbase.com


______________________________________________________________________
Get Your Own Dedicated Windows 2000 Server
  PIII 800 / 256 MB RAM / 40 GB HD / 20 GB MO/XFER
  Instant Activation � $99/Month � Free Setup
  http://www.pennyhost.com/redirect.cfm?adcode=coldfusionb
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to