So was the RedHat support issue, so that means there's no evidence of MM only providing their products for "supported" platforms. Even at that, I don't think RedHat compatibility had anything to do with support - you only get support if you pay for it. I assume that the majority of RedHat installs out there aren't paid for.
However, you're probably right - or perhaps they received some pressure from some of the J2EE vendors, who knew that CF6 would generate additional J2EE opportunities that they didn't want to lose to Jakarta and the like. Or most likely, they want to push JRun sales - if you can only run Neo on certain J2EE engines, you might as well go with JRun, right? (If memory serves me correct, can't CF6 run by itself? I hope so. Otherwise the cost of CF6 goes way up.) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Zac Belado" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 2:27 PM Subject: RE: CF6 & true J2EE Compliance (was Re: Macromedia.com) > > Then why is there an Apache module? > > User demand? Besides, that was produced by Allaire not Macromedia. > ______________________________________________________________________ Why Share? Dedicated Win 2000 Server � PIII 800 / 256 MB RAM / 40 GB HD / 20 GB MO/XFER Instant Activation � $99/Month � Free Setup http://www.pennyhost.com/redirect.cfm?adcode=coldfusionc FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
