If that's the case, so be it. However, I know some of the early stuff I heard (I distinctly remember this coming from Forta early last year at our CFUG meeting) is that it will be truly portable, as with most J2EE implementations. I find this rather disappointing, because other than some performance gains, it doesn't appear that CF will be changing much (so much for sales to those who have already made significant J2EE investments across the enterprise). Though from MM's point of view, it makes perfect sense (ensures licensing).
----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Watts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 2:38 PM Subject: RE: CF6 & true J2EE Compliance (was Re: Macromedia.com) > > > In other words, they make it sound as if I can take my > > > class files generated on a Win32 box and move them anywhere > > > I want - even on a machine without CF. > > > > If the CF code is compiled to Java byte-code, this would > > certainly be possible. > > Well, not really, I don't think. There will be dependencies in that > bytecode, and those dependencies will point to a set of libraries, and those > libraries will essentially "be" Neo. > > Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software > http://www.figleaf.com/ > voice: (202) 797-5496 > fax: (202) 797-5444 > ______________________________________________________________________ Get Your Own Dedicated Windows 2000 Server PIII 800 / 256 MB RAM / 40 GB HD / 20 GB MO/XFER Instant Activation · $99/Month · Free Setup http://www.pennyhost.com/redirect.cfm?adcode=coldfusionb FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
