In CF5, it's not supposed to matter if you do cfloop or cfoutput.  
I've 

done some testing with getTickCount() to compare the two and they seem 

to be equivalent.  I remember back in the version 3 days where cfloop 

would be slow as molasses.

----- Original Message -----
From: Dave Carabetta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, February 1, 2002 1:32 pm
Subject: Re: Best Practice on using/optimizing cfoutput and cfloops

> I would actually disput that claim. I can't find the article for 

> the life of 

> me, but I think Michael Dinowitz or somebody wrote an article some 

> time ago 

> comparing the two methods. From what I remember CFLOOP is faster 

> because it 

> is a "dumbed down" way of outputting your data. It doesn't lo
ok 

> for record 

> set counts or anything, it just loops over whatever you give it. 
I 

> wish I 

> could support this claim with valid links to writings, but I know 

> I have 

> heard and read that CFLOOP is faster.
> 

> Dave.
> 

> 

> ----Original Message Follows----
> From: "Paul Giesenhagen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Best Practice on using/optimizing cfoutput and cfloo
ps
> Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 12:47:24 -0600
> 

> <cfoutput> is much faster than cfloop .... always try to 
use 

> cfoutput when
> you can.
> 

> Paul Giesenhagen
> QuillDesign
> http://www.quilldesign.com
> SiteDirector - Commerce Builder
> 

> 

> 

> > I am wondering if anyone can advise if one practice (below) is mo
re
> > efficient than the other.
> >
> >
> > Practice 1: Enclosing every instance on #variables# in cfou
tput 

> tags >
> > <body>
> > <cfoutput query="query_name">
> > #query_variable#
> > </cfoutput>
> > </body>
> >
> >
> >
> > VERSUS
> >
> >
> >
> > Practice 2: Enclosing the entire code in a single cfoutput and 

> use cfloop
> > when necessary
> >
> > <body>
> > <cfoutput>
> > <cfloop query="query_name">
> > #query_variable#
> > </cfloop>
> > </cfoutput>
> > </body>
> >
> >
> >
> > Any advise to demystify any 'performance penalties' would be 

> appreciated. >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Michael
> >
> 

> _______________________
_________________________
______________________
> Get Your Own Dedicated Windows 2000 Server
>  PIII 800 / 256 MB RAM / 40 GB HD / 20 GB MO/XFER
>  Instant Activation � $99/Month � Free Setup
>  http://www.pennyhost.com/redirect.cfm?adcode=coldfusionb

> FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
> Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion
com/
> Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sideb
ar=lists
> 
______________________________________________________________________
Dedicated Windows 2000 Server
  PIII 800 / 256 MB RAM / 40 GB HD / 20 GB MO/XFER
  Instant Activation � $99/Month � Free Setup
  http://www.pennyhost.com/redirect.cfm?adcode=coldfusiona
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to