Alright already, I get the point. Use CFINCLUDE, It's much faster when doing something like this.
All your base ______________________ steve oliver atnet solutions, inc. http://www.atnetsolutions.com -----Original Message----- From: Stephen Moretti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 11:19 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: cfinclude, who to pass for variables to? > Ok were talking milliseconds here, but yeah variables are passed to any > page that you cfinclude, so it would be easier to do it that way. > That may be true with one or two users on the server, but you try that on a live server with hundreds of concurrent users where the web server is queuing request, CF is queuing requests and your database is queuing too! You'll wind up with a deadlock and timeout on the CFHTTP! Here's how it goes... say you've got 3 users and 3 connections to CF. Those three users are all accessing the same page with the same cfhttp in it. Each of those templates calls cfhttp to another template. The web server gets the requests and puts them in the queue waiting to access to CF. 1) CF is sitting there waiting for a response from the CFHTTP, so the user is also waiting for a web page to come back. 2) The CFHTTP request is sitting in a queue waiting to get access to CF, but can't because all the connections are used up 3) Goto point 1, until CF gives up waiting for a response from CFHTTP and returns an error to the user. 4) The CFHTTP request gets onto the server, but the response has no where to go! One dead application! Stephen ______________________________________________________________________ Why Share? Dedicated Win 2000 Server � PIII 800 / 256 MB RAM / 40 GB HD / 20 GB MO/XFER Instant Activation � $99/Month � Free Setup http://www.pennyhost.com/redirect.cfm?adcode=coldfusionc FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
