CF MX isn't as far along in the cycle as Flash MX is. Add in that Flash is really the star of MM and you see why it was written that way. I'm quite sure (with all of MM listening here) that when the press release is written for CF MX that the reverse will be said and Flash will be mentioned as a 'supporting' technology for CF.
At 11:22 AM 3/4/02, you wrote: >I don't like how they seem to have CF MX as errr 'supporting' Flash MX.. >*folds arms and pouts* > >The whole thing was about Flash MX basically. > >*taps foot and pouts some more* > >-Gel > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >www.macromedia.com/macromedia/proom/pr/2002/flash_mx_apps.html > ______________________________________________________________________ Get Your Own Dedicated Windows 2000 Server PIII 800 / 256 MB RAM / 40 GB HD / 20 GB MO/XFER Instant Activation � $99/Month � Free Setup http://www.pennyhost.com/redirect.cfm?adcode=coldfusionb FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
