Hm.. That's odd. I thought it to be faster, in terms of administration and response. I know that the reports are a bit slower to initially respond, due to the heavy use of calculations for graphs and charts. But overall, I thought it to be a smoother and quicker program.
(Could it be that I'm thinking that because we moved it to a newer, very slightly faster, server when we brought in 6.x? <grin>) | -----Original Message----- | From: Frank Mamone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] | Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 8:40 AM | To: CF-Talk | Subject: Re: Server Stats/Analayze Program | | | Hi Bill, | | We use LiveStats v 5.+ and are extremely satisfied although | the newest version (6-I think) has a lot more flair but is | much slower. There is an amazing feature in version 5 where | it builds a usage map based on section of the site visited. | This is very accurate if you seperate your site sectio ns by | directory. | | Now about Fusebox and stats. I am presently researching the | possibility o f using FuseBox for our future projects. The | fact that everything goes to index.cfm really bothered me | because it's difficult get stats with getting/building a | specific program for Fusebox sites. | | Finally we came up with a simple modification in Fusebox | which allows us | to | track with LiveStats. | | I am interested in your comments good and bad on using | Fusebox with your projects. | | Thanks | | ----- Original Message ----- | From: "BILL BROWN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 3:49 PM | Subject: RE: Server Stats/Analayze Program | | | > LiveStats is a very nice program, but we couldn't get it to handle | > quer | y | > strings (a big part of a Fuseboxed site). We ultimately went with | > WebTrends because of its data conduits with several CMS | programs (one | > o | f | > which is Spectra). | > | > We also evaluated Summary (http://www.summary.net/) and Sawmill | (http://www | > sawmill.net/). Summary was probably the lead contender as it was | > extremely fast and very configurable. Sawmill was great, but it was | > way too complex. | > | > Bill Brown | > Web Developer | > Desert Schools Federal Credit Union | > | > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/5/02 1:09 PM >>> | > I second that. Even back when it was MediaHouse, Live Stats was | > terrif | ic | > real-time stats program. www.deepmetrix.com | > | > Regards, | > | > Eric J. Hoffman | > Director of Internet Development | > DataStream Connexion, LLC | > (formerly Small Dog Design) | > | > -----Original Message----- | > From: Larry Juncker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] | > Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 1:59 PM | > To: CF-Talk | > Subject: RE: Server Stats/Analayze Program | > | > We have been using the Deep Metrix product for three years and have | > jus | t | > upgraded to the 6.2 version. | > | > We like it a lot better than webtrends ourselves. | > | > It has worked super for us | > | > -----Original Message----- | > From: Jason Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] | > Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 7:55 AM | > To: CF-Talk | > Subject: OT: Server Stats/Analayze Program | > | > I'm currently evaluating DeepMetrix's livestats6 vs. WebTrends | > pacakge. Can anyone recommend or share his experience? | > | ______________________________________________________________________ Get Your Own Dedicated Windows 2000 Server PIII 800 / 256 MB RAM / 40 GB HD / 20 GB MO/XFER Instant Activation � $99/Month � Free Setup http://www.pennyhost.com/redirect.cfm?adcode=coldfusionb FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
