Geez, not only do you do this better than I do, but you do it faster. Maybe you're worth the money. (smile)
----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Watts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:57 PM Subject: RE: Confessions of a sloppy non-CFLOCKer--Real question-- > > So is it better to not have a name but have the scope? > > It's better to have whichever is appropriate for your case. If you're > locking memory variables (Session, Application, Server) and you're using CF > 4.5.x or higher, you should use the SCOPE attribute and the appropriate > value. If you're locking something other than a memory variable, such as > access to a single-threaded CFX, or you're using CF 4.0.x - which only > supports the NAME attribute - you should use the NAME attribute. > > Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software > http://www.figleaf.com/ > voice: (202) 797-5496 > fax: (202) 797-5444 > > ______________________________________________________________________ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
