> but i think the important thing to remember with the whole cflock > situation, it forces developers > to think & understand about how the CF-Server works
Excellent point. In fact, I'd like to suggest that ColdFusion be enhanced with more features that require us to think about internal apects of our software and hardware. Here's an idea... How about if some tags require that their attributes be placed into certain processor registers. Then CF could implement a "feature" that allowed us to load the registers. <!--- Start of new feature example ---> <cflock scope="session" timeout="150" throwontimeout="Yes" type="READONLY"> <cf_asm> mov eax, session.UserID mov ebx, form.Password mov acx, variables.RetryCount </cf_asm> </cflock> <cfSillySignin> <!--- eax=User ID, ebx=Password, ecx=Retry count ---> <cf_asm> jc signin_Bad <!--- Carry set means signin failed ---> signin_OK: mov ax, 1 jmp exit signin_Bad: mov ax, 0 exit: mov variables.SignInResult, ax </cf_asm> <cfset variables.SignInResult = YesNoFormat(variables.SignInResult )> <!--- And of new feature example ---> Wouldn't that be great? We'd all learn about how the Pentium works. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Zac Spitzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 8:46 AM Subject: Re: UDFs, CF Locking, etc., and NEO=fixed ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
