i agree. asp is designed as a COM wrapper. however, i wasn't asking ease of coding. i was asking efficiency of the scripting engine in regards to instantiating/manipulating objects.
i'd lean toward ASP being more effient in that regard, as well (after all, it was designed to do that). i was just asking if anyone had empirical evidence. christopher olive cto, vp of web development, vp it security atnet solutions, inc. 410.931.4092 http://www.atnetsolutions.com -----Original Message----- From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 12:47 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: REPOST: Re: CDONTS and ReplyTo > i don't know if that's entirely correct. is ASP more > efficient at creating/manipulating objects than CF? that's > all the calls do, at the base level. In general, it's certainly easier to work with COM interfaces in ASP compared to CF, with all the clunkiness in CFOBJECT. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496 fax: (202) 797-5444 ______________________________________________________________________ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
