ColdFusion Express is the one with limited features. ColdFusion Enterprise is the version of CF with the most features.
At 04:49 PM 4/4/2002 +0100, you wrote: >I think people are confusing the CF Enterprise with the 1 user license. CF >Enterprise is a version of CF server just with less tags supported. so if >you are not using the full tag list then this may be your bag > >-----Original Message----- >From: Robert Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: 04 April 2002 16:46 >To: CF-Talk >Subject: RE: CF VS ASP <- let the trolling being > > >You can use CF Express, but it is a little limiting, but CF5 is free as >a 1 connection developmental server that you can install at home and >use, but only allowed 1 connection, which would be yourself. Well, I >guess I could use it for my personal home page as well, since I am the >only one that ever visits it, lol > >Rob > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 7:34 AM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: RE: CF VS ASP <- let the trolling being > >Where is this Free version of coldfusion. are you referring to CF >Express? > >Anthony Petruzzi >Webmaster >954-321-4703 >http://www.sheriff.org > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Daye, Marianne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 10:36 AM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: RE: CF VS ASP <- let the trolling being > > >Pardon me! I hadn't heard of CF Enterprise. Hence the question "Does >CF >have an equivalent?". If I ever get to code in CF again I'll have to >look >into that. > >I don't know what it is you don't get, but as a part-time telecommuter, >I >prefer not to have to rely on a remote server while developing. As for >using the web site on the laptop, the application contains a lengthy >survey >that relies on skip-logic; not something we would want to do over in >another >format (gets expensive). > >I have no interest in debating whether or not it's 'fair' that ASP is >free. >For the young beginner or hobbyist, it's may be the only affordable >option >to get started! > >Yeah, I guess you can develop CF in Notepad as well; just never did. >Scratch that point. > >Have a nice day! > >Marianne > >-----Original Message----- >From: Robert Everland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 9:15 AM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: RE: CF VS ASP <- let the trolling being > > >1. PWS? What???? I don't get it. PWS is a web server. Sure ASP is built >in, >but you can get a FREE Developer version of CF Enterprise and it can >work in >conjunction with PWS. Where's the problem here? > >2. Again if you install the free version of CF on the laptop I doubt >this >would be an issue. Though I question having an entire web application on >a >laptop. If anything I would have given them the information they needed >in >another form and made life easier to upload data to the rest of the >application. > >Sure you pay for CF, but we already knew this. Not everyone can have 75% >of >the world's desktop so they can just offer things for free. I don't see >why >you can't program CF in a word processor, matter of fact a lot of my >debugging is on notepad when I am offsite. Sure I love CF Studio, but it >is >in no means required. > >I don't understand some of the issues you brought up here. Please >explain >better. > >Robert Everland III >Dixon Ticonderoga >Web Developer Extraordinaire > >-----Original Message----- >From: Daye, Marianne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 9:11 AM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: RE: CF VS ASP <- let the trolling being > > >I have to agree that CF is easier and faster to use than ASP. However, >ASP >does have the advantage of PWS. Does CF have an equivalent? I started >out >with ASP, then used CF for two years, and now I'm using ASP again. I'm >not >ecstatic about it, but I have found a couple of advantages: > >1. Thanks to PWS, if I want to work from home, I can just copy the ASP >site >to my home computer. With CF I had to work across a cable connection >which >slowed things down a bit. Of course, I have to access the database over >the >network either way, but the web files can be retrieved and saved faster >with >PWS. > >2. One of our web sites is not only used by people on-line, but also by >field personnel who use laptops, and have to upload and download data. >Thanks to PWS and MSDE, they will be able to use the same ASP pages as >the >on-line users, while using DTS to transfer data back and fourth. In a >similar situation with CF, we had to develop a separate Access >application >for the field team members. > >Some other more obvious advantages is that ASP is free and can be >developed >in a simple word processor, if need be. Microsoft is also a huge name, >whether you like them or not, and it doesn't hurt to know how to user >their >technology. > >Marianne Daye >Programmer/Analyst > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Thane Sherrington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 3:09 PM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: RE: CF VS ASP <- let the trolling being > > >At 12:06 PM 4/3/02 -0800, David Schmidt wrote: > >If he's willing to fork the bucks for the training. Grab hold, hang >on, >and > >take what you can learn. > >A cold hearted approach (but I think wise) would be to get the training >paid for, and then move to a company that is more reasonable. > >T > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
