Also remember that incrementValue() is slower than using x=x+1 in this type of scenario and could be slowing it down even more.
-Justin Scott, Lead Developer Sceiron Internet Services, Inc. http://www.sceiron.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marlon Moyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 2:25 PM Subject: Re: cfswitch vs switch > I also just rewrote the cfscript part using a 'if else if' format and it > performed in 110ms. The performance hit of 'switch' is amazing. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Marlon Moyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 1:15 PM > Subject: Re: cfswitch vs switch > > > > I got curious and tested it out for myself. Here's the results: > > > > cfscript switch - 600 ms > > cfswitch - 181 ms > > > > for this code: > > > > <cfset time1 = gettickcount()> > > <cfscript> > > j = 0; > > i = 0; > > > > for (i = 1;i lte 1000;i=incrementvalue(i)) { > > j = RandRange(1,10000); > > > > switch (j) { > > case "j lte 250": { > > j = j +1; > > break; > > } > > case "j lte 500": { > > j=j+1; > > break; > > } > > case "j lte 750": { > > j=j+1; > > break; > > } > > case "j lte 1000": { > > j=j+1; > > break; > > } > > } > > > > } > > > > </cfscript> > > <cfset out = GetTickcount() - time1> > > <cfoutput>cfscript switch - #out# ms</cfoutput> > > <cfset time1 = getTickCount()> > > > > <cfset j=0> > > <cfset i=0> > > > > <cfloop from="1" to="1000" index="i"> > > <cfset j=RandRange(1,10000)> > > <cfswitch expression="j"> > > <cfcase value="j lte 250"> > > <cfset j = j +1> > > </cfcase> > > <cfcase value="j lte 500"> > > <cfset j = j +1> > > </cfcase> > > <cfcase value="j lte 750"> > > <cfset j = j +1> > > </cfcase> > > <cfcase value="j lte 1000"> > > <cfset j = j +1> > > </cfcase> > > </cfswitch> > > </cfloop> > > > > <cfset out = GetTickcount() - time1> > > <cfoutput><br>cfswitch - #out# ms</cfoutput> > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Marlon Moyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 12:54 PM > > Subject: cfswitch vs switch > > > > > > > I seem to remember hearing that the cfscript switch statement is a dog > > compared to the equivalent cfswitch code...Is this correct? > > > > > > > > > Marlon > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
